Skip Navigation

  • Home
  • Contact us
  • FAQ
  • Glossary
  • Public key
  • Sitemap
  • Cymraeg
  • What's new
CPNI - Centre for the Protection of National Infastructure

Advanced search

  • About CPNI
  • The threats
  • Security planning
  • Methods of attack
  • Protecting your assets
  • Products and services
    • CSIRTUK advisories
      • Advisories archive
    • General protective security publications
    • InfoSec briefings
    • InfoSec technical notes
    • InfoSec vulnerability disclosures
    • Good practice guidelines
    • Viewpoints
    • Information exchanges
    • Risk Management Delivery Group
  • Research
Home > Products and services > CSIRTUK advisories > Advisories archive > March 2007 > Debian security advisories

March 2007

Debian security advisories

ID: 95
Ref: 037/2007
Date: 16 March 2007:14:33:55
Version: 1

Title: Debian security advisories
Abstract: Details of security advisories concerning mozilla, gnupg and webcalendar
Vendors affected: Debian
Operating systems affected: Debian
Applications affected: Debian

Package : mozilla
Vulnerability : several
Problem type : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE IDs : CVE-2006-6497 CVE-2006-6498 CVE-2006-6499 CVE-2006-6501
CVE-2006-6502 CVE-2006-6503 CVE-2006-6505 CERT advisories: VU#263412 VU#405092 VU#427972 VU#428500 VU#447772
VU#606260 VU#887332
BugTraq ID : 21668

http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1265

Package : gnupg
Vulnerability : several
Problem-Type : local(remote)
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID : CVE-2007-1263
Debian Bug : 413922 414170

http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1266

Package : webcalendar
Vulnerability : missing input sanitising
Problem-Type : remote
Debian-specific: no
CVE ID : CVE-2007-1343

http://www.debian.org/security/2007/dsa-1267
______________________________________________________________________________

CPNI values your feedback.

1. Which of the following most reflects the value of the advisory to you?
(Place an 'X' next to your choice)

Very useful:__ Useful:__ Not useful:__

2. If you did not find it useful, why not?


3. Any other comments? How could we improve our advisories?


Thank you for your contribution.
______________________________________________________________________________

CPNI wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Debian for the information contained in this advisory.
______________________________________________________________________________

  • Accessibility |
  • Terms and conditions |
  • Privacy statement |
  • Data protection act |
  • Freedom of information |