Skip to content

Body Armour for Civilian Security Staff

A suite of documents intending to guide managers in the selection, procurement and management of appropriate body armour for their civilian security staff

Last Updated 24 January 2022


Body armour on top half of mannequinSecurity managers should consider whether there is a need to procure appropriate body armour for their staff to provide protection against attacks using knives and firearms.

The current standards for body armour have been developed by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory's (Dstl) Centre for Applied Science and Technology (previously Home Office). Although they were primarily intended for use by police forces they are also appropriate for other users. Dstl maintains a list of accredited products which have been found to meet the standards when tested at approved facilities.

    Guidance documents

    The key points to be considered when selecting body armour are shown in the diagram. 

    The characteristics of body armour are explained in more detail in the CPNI document Body Armour for Security Officers available below. This document provides background knowledge on body armour and guidance on its specification, procurement and maintenance.

    There are also five factsheets available which delve further into the effects of various threats and the testing undertaken to suggest the most appropriate body armour:


    • Firearms - an introduction to various types of firearms and ammunition
    • Injury Mechanisms - a look at injuries both with and without intervening body armour
    • Ballistic Injuries - an introduction to the two types of ballistic injuries
    • Body Armour Types - an introduction to different types of body armour
    • Test Procedures - background into testing various types of body armour
    Did you find this page useful? YesNo
    Thank you for your feedback. If you have any further suggestions on how this information can be made even more useful to improve your experience, feel free to share details below.
    Thank you for your feedback. Sorry to hear that you haven't found this information useful. Please help us improve your experience and share how we can make this information more useful for you.